Therapy is upside down.

When a survivor first has their stroke the brain is very vulnerable. And because it's vulnerable the survivor shouldn't do very much. The first few days after stroke is a time to convalesce. There is a time to add intensity to the recovery effort. But during the first few days, generally referred to as the acute phase, is not when intensity should be attempted. There are more important things to do. Like saving as much brain is possible (the domain of medical doctors).

So what do therapists do during acute phase? Most therapists involved in acute care will tell you the same thing: "We do whatever they can." That is, whatever the patient is physically able to do is encouraged. But there is often not very much the stroke survivor can do. Yet therapy immediately after stroke is generous. There is often hours per day slated for acute care therapy. But that's not when hours are needed. Hours are needed during the subacute phase.

The subacute phase is usually defined as "seven days to three months." But this is actually a misrepresentation. The fact is, like anything with stroke, it's different for every survivor. Each phase, in fact, happens in a different time for each individual survivor. In any case, it's the subacute phase when intensive efforts towards recovery should begin. Yet for many stroke survivors there's actually a reduction in the number of hours of therapy during the subacute phase as compared to the acute phase. In this way, therapy for stroke survivors is upside down.

By: "stroke recovery blog" "stroke blog"

Here Come the Vendors

I do a lot of talks about stroke recovery. About 80 per year. I learn so much from the therapists I talk to. Many of them are committed, caring, bright and motivated. I like the fact that I'm doing my talk to good people.

But there is one segment of therapists that can be tough to love. 

Attending my seminars have been lots people from a variety of companies. These companies usually represent products. Sometimes they represent services, clinical trials, organizations, etc. But usually it’s products. And for me, these people can be very dangerous. They either want to know what I'm saying about their product or want me to promote their product. Those who want to know what I'm saying about their product never voluntarily tell me where they work. Those that want to promote their product are just the opposite. At some point in the seminar they'll approach me and talk up their product. And it's always uncomfortable. 

Many of the products have little or no scientific evidence behind them. Doing the research to provide evidence for a product is expensive and laborious. It's quicker, cheaper and less fraught with risk to just put your product to market, and promote it. And I become a part of their promotion. So when I'm approached, it usually feels like hucksterism. It feels like I'm being sold on a product so that my seminar might become a platform for promotion.

People will hand me their card, and talk about the product. That card will become a reminder to look at product up. So how do I look it up? I try to strip away the product name in order to get to the core of the product, and then research that core. For example, let's say somebody is selling Stroke-A-Way. If I look up Stroke-A-Way all I'll find is what Stroke-A-Way wants me to find. So instead, I look up the "active ingredient" (concept, or exercise, or whatever). I try to see if the active ingredient is scientifically based.

But what if it doesn't work? A lot of times I can go straight to clinical research sites during the seminar and look the "active ingredient" up. I can also send out a quick e-mail to experts in the field (I've been in research for a long time; lots of contacts) and ask their opinion.

So: What if the product sucks?

If the product has no evidence, I don't advocate it. And if you're a vendor, and I say your product has no evidence, you'll be pissed. But you shouldn't be. You're at the course, you read the course description, and you know I'm in research. So... I'm going to do the research.

I wish these folks would read their diploma. On there- someplace- is the word "science." It'll be an Associate of Science, a Bachelor of Science, a Masters of Science, or Doctorate of Science. When you got your license you dedicated yourself to providing treatment options based in... science.

So bringing it up in the seminar is not just dangerous for me, it's dangerous for the vendor. What if, because the vendor made me aware of the product, I research the product. And what if I find no evidence it works? The next time somebody asks me about the product I'll say there's no evidence behind it. I have to. It's my job. It probably would have been better had they not talked to me about it at all.

You know what the most widely read entry in this entire blog is? The entry on neuroaid. I only became aware of the product because they copped the name of this blog; The Stroke Recovery Blog. The theft got my attention, and made me do the research to find out that it...

• had a very low level of evidence behind it
• was available in a less expensive form
• used researchers who had a clear conflict of interest to promote it.

So if you get my attention, be prepared for the inevitable question: Is it evidence-based? This is my job. And I talked to  a lot of stroke survivors who want it to be the job of every clinician. Figure out what works, and then do it. And the stuff the doesn't work. Don't do it.

BTW: Frankly, I don't necessarily advocate the products advertised on this blog. However, I will not accept advertisement for products A) that clearly don't work or B) competing products exists which better provide the "active ingredient."

 

By: "stroke recovery blog" "stroke blog"

Sex After Stroke

A recent article showed that sex was at least "least somewhat important" in approximately half of men 75 years and older. Odds were reduced in interest and participation in sexual activity the higher the age, if the partner had physical limitations and the use of antidepressants and beta blockers.

So what is the effect of stroke on sexual activity? 

Almost 75% of strokes occur in folks over 65. Added to the advanced age of most stroke survivors there is also usually add increase in medications as a result of a stroke. There are also the mental and physical impacts of stroke that take a toll on sexuality. Included reasons are to believe that the stroke may affect the relationship, financial issues and low self-esteem.

Stroke is not usually cause sexual dysfunction. 

But there are a variety of us psychological issues that do impact sex after stroke. The new challenges that stroke survivors and caregivers have to go through when they get home block out everything else. Scheduling health care workers, dealing with managed care and paperwork, as well challenges of getting to and from all the appointments are just some of the problems that get in the way of other, more fun, things. There is a period after stroke in which sex usually doesn't take place. But this little is usually temporary. For instance, 80% of men with erectile dysfunction after stroke regained the ability to have sex a few months later. And that change was spontaneous.

There is a general belief that after stroke sex can cause another stroke. This hardly ever happens (although it may be true in people with parallel heart disease -- consult your physician). Despite the fact that sex is safe after stroke as many as half of all survivors fear that sex may cause harm. Many partners of survivors also have fear that sex will cause another stroke in their partner.

By: "stroke recovery blog" "stroke blog"

Walking in Rhythm

During stroke recovery "the good trains the bad." This is known as "bilateral training." In anyone, stroke or not, it is true "the good trains the bad." Here's an example: I'm a drummer. I'm right-hand dominant. If I try to tap my left hand as fast as I can it is not as fast as if I tap it alternately with the right dominant hand. Research has found that my left hand will not only be quicker, but it will be more accurate when I do the movement with my right hand. So I will be both faster and hit the drum where it should be hit.

In stroke survivors bilateral training can be used to begin the recovery process. And it can be used to help stroke survivors with very little movement. Survivors with very little movement are sometimes called "lower-level." (This designation says nothing about the ability to think, only the ability to move.) The reason bilateral training works for lower-level stroke survivors is because the way bilateral training may work. And I say may, because nobody's really sure. Bilateral training may work because the two limbs communicate with each other even when that communication does not go through the brain. It's the reason infants step even before they can walk.

Click here: See a baby walk before it can walk

It's why, in animal experiments, you can sever the spinal cord but the back legs will automatically go into walking pattern when they're put on a treadmill. It has to do with neural networks that are in the spinal cord. These networks are collectively called the central pattern generator (CPG). The CPG allows for limbs to communicate from the fingertips of one hand to the fingertips of the opposite hand (or "toe to toe"), right through the spinal cord.

In the arms and legs, bilateral training is relatively straightforward. In the arms you would have each arm trying to hit a target. You could have both hands attempting to alternate to hit a target. You could also have it set up so the "good "hand has to hit a target that much further away than the "bad" hand. You can also do this with a rhythm. The idea would be to use a metronome (click, click, click, rhythmically) or music where the drumbeat would dictate when each hand would have to meet the target.

In the lower extremity it similar: there is a rhythmic component. You would try to take exactly the same step length with the "good" and "bad" legs. A rhythmic component is added the same way as the arms: music, or a metronome is used to establish be in each footfall happens on each beat. It is thought that reestablishing the rhythmicity of gait will help reestablish the symmetry of gait.

As I said in a PT trade mag...

"A simple metronome either heard through headphones or carried by the therapist next to the stroke survivor can be used to promote the re-establishment of rhythmicity of gait. Plugging the ears using standard noise-reducing plugs can boost the volume of footfall to make that obvious to the survivor. The trick is then to match the footfall to the beat."

By: "stroke recovery blog" "stroke blog"

Stroke = Dog Tired

As many as 70% of stroke survivors complain about fatigue. Many stroke survivors think that fatigue is the worst thing caused by their stroke. 

Stroke survivors should be four times as tired as everyone else, and I can prove it. Research shows that, when you compare survivors to age-matched “couch potatoes," the stroke survivors are in half as good cardiovascular health. Research also shows that most everything (i.e. walking, dressing, bathing etc.) takes twice as much energy after a stroke. Mathematically… 

(Twice as much energy needed) 
x (half as much energy available) 
= (I need a nap)

The best thing you can do is stay in good cardiovascular and muscular shape. This means resistance training and cardio work. It may be counter-intuitive, but exercise increases energy. Other things that will help increase energy levels include 

• Eating well 

• drinking plenty of water 

• sleeping well

"stroke recovery blog"  "stroke blog"  "stronger after stroke blog"

What do doctors know?

Show me a neurologist or physiatrist who does not know that recovery can continue after a year and I'll show you someone who should lose their license.

In some ways doctors are forced by the Hippocratic Oath to lowball any estimate of recovery. If a doctor says you won't recover, and then you do, they can say “Great!” If a doctor says, "You can expect a great recovery” and you don't, they have done you harm.

In terms of having a doctor understand rehabilitation per se, it's probably not going to happen. The responsibility for rehabilitation is offloaded to therapists. The one exception to this may be physiatrists. However, although they may be very aware of various recovery options, they are not trained in rehabilitation techniques.

Of course, MDs can be a driving force towards recovery. Each clinician (MD, therapist) has a unique role to play. Some MDs are not very well versed in all things recovery. If you want to find aggressive MDs and therapists, click this link >>> 

By: "stroke recovery blog"  "stroke blog"  "stronger after stroke blog"

Reading to Recover

Ever want trip up a therapist? Ask this question: What's the latest stroke recovery research say? The answers will be, politely, inconsistent. Some therapists actually know a lot. Others haven't read their professional journals, ever. Look for facilities and therapists that are "evidence-based" (basing treatment on the best available scientific evidence). Being evidence-based is sort of like having a GPS.

Imagine you have two people; one person has an absolutely stellar sense of direction. They never seem to get lost. The other person has no sense direction at all. They get lost in their own neighborhood. Let's say the “neighborhood looser” buys a GPS. Now who has a better sense of direction?

Imagine you have two therapists; one therapist is very smart, intuitive, conscientious, and caring. Everyone says they are a great therapist. The other therapist is sloppy, snotty and disorganized. Let's say snotty therapist reads a lot of stroke recovery research and implements what he reads. Now who is the better therapist?


By: "stroke recovery blog"  "stroke blog"  "stronger after stroke blog"

Simple. Brain. Recovery. Game.

Stroke recovery involves neuroplasticity. You can slice it and you can dice it but the bottom line always comes back to stroke as brain injury -- and how to overcome it. If you can't get the brain to reorganize around the injury, recovery is toast.

• Spasticity: caused by brain damage.

• Inability to feel the movement: caused by brain damage.

• Unilateral neglect (decreased attention to the “bad” side): caused by brain damage.

• Lack of control over the affected arm and leg: caused by brain damage.

• Aphasia: caused by brain damage

• Vision problems: caused by brain damage

• And much more!: caused by brain damage

So the answer to the question “… how might movement problems be overcome?” is simple: Rewire your brain.

And it is good that it is simple because only the stroke survivor can do it. A therapist could have a double major physical and occupational therapist PhD from Harvard school of Super Duper Rehab summa cum laude with postdoctoral training as a Rhodes Scholar and they still can't do it for you. You know the old Smokey the Bear poster: "Only you can prevent forest fires"? For stroke survivors the poster should say: "Only you can drive neuroplastic change". Fortunately, the rules for rewiring your brain are very, very simple. Unfortunately, rewiring takes a tremendous amount of hard work.

And what does it take? Repetitive practice.

Repetitive practice is boring.
So try spicing up with a video game yay!

"stroke recovery blog" "stroke recovery blog" "stroke recovery blog" "stroke recovery blog" "stroke recovery blog" "stroke recovery blog" "stroke recovery blog"

When all you have is a hammer everything looks like a nail

I got an email from an author the other day. He’s written a book about stroke recovery. He said that he’d heard that I did “...not like presenting other peoples' work as helpful for stroke survivors." I explained to him my position this way:

I work in rehab research; have since the 90's. All of that research has been stroke-specific. One of the things I've learned is that clinicians had made the mistake over and over and over (for decades) of buying into completely ineffective treatment options. They did this for 2 reasons:

1. The treatment had/has a charismatic leader
2. Clinicians in rehab don't typically read research.

So even if large studies came out and say "Those things don't work" clinicians just kept/keep on doing (and promoting, and selling books about, and teaching) them. And then there are categories of "treatments" that have no research (standardized, controlled trials) at all supporting them. So in my talks (I do many) I start by saying "Most of what has been used for stroke recovery is ineffective or untested. Here's what we think we know…” And most clinitians get it. They're pros. They want better tools.

I actually promote (when appropriate) a bunch of people and ideas. But anything endorsed is evidenced based and what that means is very specific: Has the treatment option reached meta-analysis and did that meta-analysis show efficacy? If it has and it does I'm all in.

If not, I let people know.

What I find from survivors is that they want us to hash this stuff out. They want us to have these discussions and not just stick with the same old because it’s what we feel comfortable.

E-Stim. If dude can do it, so can you.

(EZ directions for doing electrical stimulation after stroke can be found here)

Electrical stimulation (e-stim) after stroke is the single most important modality there is for recovery. A modality is...application of something therapeutic like a hot pack or cold gel or...e-stim. Part of the reason e-stim is so important is that it does so many different things. 

Drunk smoking guys 

use e-stim for fun!

But here's some funny: Some OTs (occupational therapists) cannot do e-stim clinically. Why? It turns out that—in some States—OTs have to get a special post-secondary education certification to do it. Which was always weird to me. You know that ad where you can use the stim "ab-exerciser" that’s supposed to give you ripped abs while you lounge around because the e-stim builds muscle? And who’s ordering that? Some drunk guy at 2 in the morning. HE can do it, but OTs can't? 

E-stim does so much that its lack of use clinically for survivors has flummoxed me for years. The reasons given for not doing it clinically tend to be of the Its too complex to set up variety. 

Jesse says: 
E-stim is not just for 
drunk folks and kids!

Enter my 10 year old son, Jesse. I have a lot of e-stim machines stored in my basement. I've accumulated them over time in various ways. And boys will be boys, and boys (and their friends) will go into the basement and put electrodes all over themselves and turn up the stim and see what pops. And they figure the machine out. Because e-stim works like this: Put on the electrodes (they stick to your skin) and turn up the stim. And see what happens. And that’s it.

And yet many clinicians shy away from e-stim. They shy away from something that can do everything from help recovery of sensation, to stretching to building muscle to starting the neuroplastic process. So talk to 'em. And if they have any questions, tell 'em to email me.

Note: There are some serious contraindications to doing estim in some folks. i.e., they can mess up pacemakers and other electronic devices. So always ask your doc first!

The perfect time to have a stroke?

I'd argue that the "best" age to have a stroke is 27. The entire brain is fully wired (the frontal lobe wires in the 26th year). You're young enough to undertake the rigors of recovery (recovery is statistically better the younger you are). But you're old enough to have your brain wired "normally" (recovery in children is often a mixed bag because the brain is not yet fully developed).

But what is the best day to have a stroke? Any day but the weekend. Turns out the having a stroke on the w/e means lower quality care than during the week. 

Will and imagination

I do a ton of talks on stroke recovery. I come from the world of research. So my perspective is a bit different to the rehab clinicians I talk to. I do my best to ease them into the world of research. I explain where they can find leading edge stroke rehab info for themselves. I describe where we are in researching stroke recovery (not very far I’m afraid). I explain how the stuff from research can be used with their patients.

And there’s the rub. Therapists and other folks in rehab sometimes have a bit of difficulty imagining how to transfer the research to their practice.

"I'm in acute care (or skilled nursing, or an outpatient clinic, or in home care, or in long term care, etc.).  I can't implement this stuff. It takes too much time (or we don't have the equipment, or don't know how to bill for it, or nursing won't follow through, etc.). This stuff can't be used on my patients because they're not motivated enough (or have too many other medical problems, or are too "low level", or are too old, etc.)"

The core concepts of relearning how to move after stroke are simple. These concepts don’t have to be done clinically the way they’re done in research. In fact, they are often more effective in the clinic. They may be more effective because clinicians can change the treatment to fit individual survivors.  Research involves a one-size-fits-all implementation. Therapists can add and subtract, slow down and speed up, skip or add more treatments.  In research all those screw up consistency.

Some therapists have no problem with implementing this stuff. Some go well beyond what I suggest. For instance, they may dovetail suggested treatment options in a mix that is beyond anything researched. (Note to clinicians who do this: make sure you use valid and reliable outcome measures to prove to yourself that these things work.)

Whats the difference between those who can and those who can't?

Will and imagination.

A test that predicts when survivors may die

A test of mental ability after stroke can predict how long a survivor will live (Find the study here.)

Poor performance on these tests can predict mortality in stroke survivors, a full decade before death. Previous tests have shown a link between heart disease and dementia after stroke and mortality. This is the first to show small amounts of cognitive decline correlating to mortality.

Here are the tests that they used.

The longer it takes to do the tests the more "impaired psychomotor speed." Participants that were the slowest third of the group for both tests were more likely to die.

In this study, the mean result for TMT A was 47 seconds and for TMT B, 119 seconds.

Also a decline in mental function before a stroke can be an indicator of an impending stroke.

Good luck!

What else can I do?

There is an inaccuracy in a recent Amazon review of Stronger After Stroke that I must correct... 

BULL

Here is part of the review:

"I have not read the book, but one of the reasons my father in law suffered a stroke was because he's blood pressure was too high due to alcohol consumption. In this book it says it's ok to have 4 oz of alcohol a day so my father in law has started drinking again. So I'm hoping I didn't start up the drinking with him by giving him this book."

Actually, there is no mention of alcohol at all, any place in the book. But the author of the review hadn't read the book, so how would they know?

Here's a part of the story that may be interesting only to me: I contacted Amazon, asking them to consider taking the review down. Amazon will only take down a review "If it in violation of one of Amazon's posted guidelines." One of posted guidelines is: "Customer reviews should be relevant to the product in question." The reviewer is clearly reviewing hearsay, not a book. In any case, I was amazed that Amazon has declined to take the review down. I'm a huge fan of Amazon! I'm disappointed.

I'm not an advocate of drinking after stroke.

Thank you.S

Demanding Repetition

I do a lot of talks on stroke recovery. From Alaska to Florida, from New Hampshire to San Diego I'm all over the place all the time. I do these talks  for therapists; OT, PT, speech. Survivors and their caregivers show up as well. Also, medical device people, nurses, physiatrists, etc. So I get to talk to a lot of people about stroke. I always do the best I can to make things as simple as possible. Here is a really simple but profound way to look at stroke recovery...

Repetitive.

Demanding.

That's it. Repetitive practice of the movement or sound or walking or skill or whatever. Of course repetitive practice has the habit of doing two things: 1) causing people to repeat things that they can do pretty well, over and over. 2) Plateau. People plateau (don't get any better) because they keep doing what they can do pretty well over and over.

That's where demanding comes in. Repeatedly practice the skill in a way that "nips at the edges" of your current ability.

Repetitive without demanding and progress will slow to a crawl.

Demanding without enough repetition will halt progress."the stroke blog" "The stroke recovery blog"

Does "X" aid recovery after stroke?

What works and what doesn't work to help recover after stroke? Research has revealed three broad categories:
1. It works
2. It doesn't work
3. We don't know yet

There is tons we don't know about stroke recovery. Stroke recovery is a million different puzzle pieces, with no picture on the front of the box to help out. But there are some resources to help answer some of the questions (at least)...

There is one website that answers, in layman's terms, what works and what doesn't work. Although the list is far from complete, it's a start. Thank you Canada!

 

stroke blog

stroke blogs

Stroke Recovery. Its About Time.

Stroke survivors are given such a short time to recover. For everyone "motor learning" takes repeated attempts in order to rewire the brain. How much more effort must motor learning take in folks who have billions of neurons killed by their stroke? The numbers get very large. I've heard "2000 for a single joint" and " 140,00" "and "10,000" and "Tens of thousands" and" millions." But guess what? Every stroke is different. So the numbers for you and how you are trying to move are different than her and what she is trying to move. I think I've come up with the perfect number for everyone. This is based on my dozens of peer-reviewed coauthored studies, and clinical research at both the Kessler Institute and the U of Cincinnati. But the number is algorithmic and gets very complicated. Ready? Here's the number...

"A lot."

It is commonly and scientifically accepted that that it takes at least 10 years to become an expert in any field. We ask stroke survivors to relearn difficult tasks such as walking within a few months to a few years of their stroke. And all this difficult motor learning is done against a backdrop in which portions of the brain that is usually used for walking is deceased. And then there's all the other variables like other health issues, depression, lack of energy, natural aging and on and on.

Anyone who has children and has gone through boxes and boxes of Band-Aids and knows that motor learning is a challenge. Skinned knees and elbows attest to this. It takes years for children to learn how to walk. How much time do we give stroke survivors whose primary neuronal circuitry for walking has been taken off-line —6 months? Stroke survivors are best served through a combination of personal empowerment and guidance from therapists. No matter how ugly, no matter how synergistic, no matter how submerged in spasticity, each volitional movement should be encouraged. People with acquired brain injury will only drive their own neuroplastic rewiring through repeated volitional attempts, that “nip at the edges” of their ability. Therapists have traditionally focused more on quality of movement and functional relevance than on a confluence of gained active range of motion. No matter how incremental, increased active range of motion in all pivots and planes provides a template for any and all future movements.

Video games+Tennis balls+ Anger=Recovery

A great article in the British newspaper The Telegraph. The article is by a stroke survivor who recovered well after an ischemic (block) stroke. He's hit on some very core ideas. Here are the most important points (comments in red are mine):

• "...nobody in the hospital was going to tell me how to get better ..."
• "I had to get out of hospital and cure myself."
• "...found that major strides had been made in America in treating stroke victims." (USA! USA! USA!)
• "Research there showed that damaged neural pathways could be re-routed" (Taub! Taub! Taub!)
• "The key was speed. After three or four weeks, the brain seemed to start a permanent shut-down on these pathways." Not true. But the guy is a "High Master" which I think is a principal. He can be forgiven.
• "I decided to bounce a tennis ball 2,000 times a day off the kitchen floor, missed catches not counting." Obsessive repetitive practice. I love it.
• "The first day it took four hours to reach the target." Ambitious repetitive practice.
• "...wrote out the alphabet, one line per letter, for two hours a day." Brilliant, I think the British say.
• "I vowed to (type) 10 pages a day, typing out my corrections on my latest book with one finger. The first 10 pages took three days." I love this guy.
• "I decided to recite the poems of Andrew Marvell for two hours a day..." Fighting aphasia by using something meaningful. This guy may have missed his calling: neuroscience.
• "I marched up and down the stripes on the lawn for two hours a day." Very Monty Python.
• To reestablish I coordination he used "a computer game flying a virtual F15 jet - or, in my case, crashing it thousands of times on the runway before finally landing it - after 40 hours' "flying" time." I think this is great. The idea of doing something fun to recover. When else in the middle of somebody's career are they allowed to play 40 hours of any game?
• "I came close to giving up the grind of rehab. But by choosing tasks like writing the alphabet or counting how many times I could walk down the lawn without crossing a stripe, I could monitor my own progress." Okay, two things: close to giving up. But not giving up. And second: being able to "monitor progress" is essential to recovery because if you don't monitor things closely how do you know if you are getting any better?
• "The difference between success and failure was...a deep anger that I was not offered more help to start with" You know, even Gandhi was not against anger. He just said you should use it wisely because it's very powerful. I'd say using anger to recover from stroke is using anger wisely. 
•  Gandhi on Anger  "I have learned through bitter experience the one supreme lesson to conserve my anger, and as heat conserved is transmuted into energy, even so our anger controlled can be transmuted into a power which can move the world." 

Bravo High Master of stroke recovery!

Find the article here.

Stroke Recovery. Are You Up for the Challenge?

Keeping it challenging...

Whatever is practiced, it must be challenging. In research, an 80-percent threshold is generally used. For instance, if a stroke survivor can successfully turn the pages in a magazine 80 percent of the time, the challenge can be increased by turning the pages of a newspaper. Since turning pages of newspaper requires increased excursion of the shoulder and elbow, the increased AROM will "trickle down" to easier tasks such as turning pages in books and magazines, card flipping and laundry folding.

What is usually done

Compensation (learning to "get by" with the "good" side). As "Dean's" puts it: Compensation being doing whatever is necessary to accomplish a goal. Recovery is using the muscles as intended to accomplish the same goal. Insurance wants you to use compensation whenever possible because it is faster and cheaper. 

Faster and cheaper

Faster and cheaper is good because its faster and cheaper. You could go to a State University. Or you could get a degree from a degree mill. You could make a a salad, but you could get the same amount of calories from a pop tart. But even as fast and cheap as they are, you'll still feel gypped.

AFO: You can check out anytime you like, but can you ever leave?

I often get questions about ankle foot orthoses (AFOs), and how to get out of them. I'm not a big fan of AFOs because they encourage a sort of "learned nonuse." It's actually more like "learned disuse." (Learned disuse: You're not learning to not use the body part, but you learning to use body part incorrectly.) And keep in mind, every movement you make changes the way your brain is wired. So it's very easy to get used to an AFO. Let's put it this way:

It's easy to walk into an AFO. It's hard to walk out.

In any case, I get a lot of e-mails about this subject. Here's an example:

 

I wear a big brace on my right leg. I am paralyzed on the right side. I walk with a one-point cane. I walk with an open hinge (articulating) AFO.

 

They opened the hinges on my old brace several years ago. I walk around my apartment with the old one. But when I go out I use the bigger brace which isn't open at hinges.

 

I read on Deans' Stroke Musings that you recommend the Air Cast. Which one for stroke survivor do you like? They have a lot of different ones on their website. 

Here's my answer:

First of all, the disclaimer:

(Warning: ENDING THE USE OF AN AFO CAN LEAD TO FALLS AND INJURIES.

Never discontinue the use of an orthotic without first consulting the appropriate health care provider. Then call your doctor. Then have your doc talk to any other providers as needed. Then discuss it some more. Thank you.)

Wear a brace on the ankle that satisfies two things:

1. Keeps you safe

2. Challenges* you

*Challenge: Walking naturally challenges you to lift your foot. If you can lift your foot up and down to stay safe (not trip) then you might consider questioning an orthotic that helps lift the foot. 

Gradation would usually be something like this:

1. Rigid AFO

2. Articulating AFO (where the ankle joint moves just a little bit)

3. A stirrup (stabilizes both sides the ankle but allows the ankle to move up and down freely)

4. A high top shoe (like a basketball shoe)

5. Nothing

There are a wide variety of other options between a rigid AFO and barefoot. Here are some. Some help bring the ankle up during gait, others support the ankle. The stirrup is usually associated with one particular company: AirCast.

~

Know a good doc or therapist?

I get this all the time:

"How does one go about looking for a neurologist or physiatrist or therapist who is familiar with the practices outlined in your book?"

You'll notice a link on the right column. Or you can click here. Either way, if you live in the USA,  you'll find resources to help find aggressive healthcare providers for your recovery team.

Then  next questions is "Where do I find an OT or PT or speech therapist who knows?" You find a resource for that too.

~

NEWS FLASH: There's No Way to Prepare For Life After Stroke

Surprise!

A recent study seems to sum up much of the whirlwind shock of life post stroke. I can't say it any better, so let me quote the authors:

There are 3 phases in the continuum from acute care to inpatient rehabilitation to home: 3 phases of this trajectory: 
1. the stroke crisis
2. expectations for recovery
3. the crisis of discharge
Stroke survivors and their caregivers faced enormous challenges as they moved through 3 phases of the trajectory. As caregivers move through the phases of the trajectory, they do not have a good understanding of the role to which they are committing. Survivors are often underprepared to take on even the basic tasks to meet the patients' needs on discharge

Conclusion: Stroke survivors and their caregivers do not have adequate time to deal with the shock and crisis of the stroke event, let alone the crisis of discharge and all of the new responsibilities with which they must deal.

STROKE CAREGIVERS HANDBOOK (free)

~

Swallowing Trouble: Dysphagia

My son Jesse, swallowing.

Dysphagia:  difficulty swallowing.

Stroke is the leading cause of dysphagia.

Approximately 60% of stroke survivors develop dysphagia at some point after stroke. Dysphagia is the most frequent cause of pneumonia poststroke. It can also delay other parts of recovery. (It's hard to recover when you can't swallow.)

 The treatment for dysphagia may follow the same neuroplastic rules as every other form of post stroke recovery. For example, repetitive practice of wrist extension will change the brain to make wrist extension easier as time goes on. But repetitive practice of wrist extension has no downside. The worst thing that can happen is that you get tired. But if you repeatedly practice swallowing there may be a risk. What happens if you can't swallow whatever it is you're trying to swallow? You choke! You may aspirate. Aspiration involves having whatever you attempt to "swallow" go "down the wrong pipe". Instead of going down the esophagus to the stomach, the material goes down the trachea to the lungs. Once lodged and lungs it can cause pneumonia. Why does it cause pneumonia? Because the lungs hate having foreign matter inside. So the lungs try to fight the foreign matter. The lungs attempt to fight the foreign matter is the very definition of infection. An infection in the lungs is called pneumonia.

There is a tendency for clinicians to undertreat patients with dysphagia. These clinicians feared that there is a risk of aspirating.

So, if repetitive practice works, but repetitive practice of swallowing is dangerous, what can you do? If a particular skill is not used (in this case swallowing), the portion of the brain that controls that skill will shrink. As that portion of the brain shrinks, the skill gets even worse. As the skill gets worse, that portion shrinks further... and a downward spiral is initiated. If the dysphagia patient is not swallowing, or not swallowing enough, the portion of the brain dedicated to swallowing will get smaller, and the skill will suffer. 

The movements involved in swallowing have been traditionally viewed as reflexive in nature. But swallowing also follows the same basic "repetitive practice equals more movement" rule.  But what if the person can't yet swallow safely in order to practice swallowing?

There is emerging literature that electrical stimulation may initiate the neuroplastic process. Again, this is not only true for the hand and foot emerging research indicates that the same is true for swallowing. Electrical stimulation may provide the "X” factor that provides small amount of movement on which to build more robust movement. This same continuum of care (e-stim to repetitive practice) is used by clinicians in rehabilitation hospitals around the country to reestablish nominal movement. Although not functional swallowing, electrical stimulation provides early steps towards regaining the ability to swallow.

In terms of the repetitive practice itself, the generally accepted way of safely repeating swallowing is called the "The Frazier Water Protocol". 

For a bit more science-y perspective, click here.

`=~