Wednesday, March 5, 2014


REPETITIVE — CHALLENGING — MEANINGFUL
TREATING
Electrical Stimulation (E-Stim)
Rhythmic Bilateral ARM Training 
Rhythmic Bilateral LEG Training 
    Mirror Therapy
    Increasing walking speed 
    Constraint Induced Therapy (CIT)
      CIT early after stroke may not be a good idea
        Amazing CIT dissertation by STACY L. FRITZ that includes:
        Sensation Recovery
        Why task specific practice important in neurorehab
        REDUCTION OF SPASTICITY
        Electrical Stimulation (E-Stim)

        Spasticity and sleep

        Mirror therapy reduces spasticity

        Stretch (any form, duration, or arc of time) does not decrease Spasticity
        Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) success in adults
        Botox strength increased, and uptake time decreased with EStim
        PRIMING THE BRAIN FOR RECOVERY

        ACTION OBSERVATION VIDEOS
        VIDEO
        RESEARCHING
        Researching Stroke Recovery
          Clinical Guidelines from around the World
          Information About Other Forms of Brain Injury
          Find Stroke-Recovery Research in Your Area
          Two Free Stroke-Specific Magazines
          MEASURING
          Measuring Recovery
          Cognitive (mental) Tests
          Posterior Pusher Syndrome (or) posterior pelvic tilting
          REFERENCING
          BDNF
          Walking within within 24 hours after stroke: help or hurt?
          ·  An article where they interviewed therapists, docs and nurses: Conclusion: Our study shows that most clinicians had concerns in relation to early mobilization of stroke patients and more clinicians had concerns for hemorrhagic than for ischemic stroke.
          · An article looking at very early mobilization and depression: Conclusion: Very early mobilization may reduce depressive symptoms in stroke patients at 7 days post-stroke.
          · Early mobilization out of bed after stroke may be all good: Conclusion: It seems to reduce severe complications but not cerebral blood flow:
          · Early mobilization out of bed after stroke, maybe: Conclusions: Insufficient data are available to prove the beneficial effects of early mobilization after stroke.
          · A Very Early Rehabilitation Trial for Stroke (AVERT): Conclusions: Fewer patients in the very early mobilisation group had a favourable outcome than those in the usual care group. 
          · The LEAPS trial (the largest study ever done on post-stroke rehab): "patients who received early locomotor training experienced more multiple falls."

          The curious case of NDT.






          No comments:

          Monday, February 24, 2014

          the most important gizmo for recovery is you

          I do stroke recovery talks to PTs and OTs (and a mix of other clinicians, survivors and caregivers) all over the US. Today I'm in Cheyenne, WY. 
          Between Casper and Cheyenne
          I've had many conversations with therapists over the years. One of the things that's remarkable is how little consistency  there is in the tools therapists have. Some therapists have every gizmo known to man, others have little other than their creativity and a few standard tools. Imagine the difference between working in a leading-edge rehab hospital vs. an on-the-road home care therapist.
          That's me. The king of PowerPoint.

          Do "stroke recovery machines" make a difference? Within reason, no. There are a few tools that may be essential. For instance, electrical stimulation, parallel bars and a mirror may be essential at some points in some survivor's recovery. Really, much more important is the training of the therapist. This is not just true in stroke rehab but in many areas of medicine; outcomes are directly tied to the training of the clinician. For most survivors, the knowledge of the therapist is the most important gizmo. 

          But remember, they'll "discharge" you at some point and then the most important gizmo for recovery is you (and caregivers!).
          3 comments:

          Tuesday, February 11, 2014

          Don't stop. Don't stagnate. Don't let a lull convince you recovery has ended.

          What about "Long-Term Rehab Management of Stroke"? What do we know about stroke recovery as we get into months and years and decades? 
          What does this post have
          to do with this girl?
          Nothing!

          The first thing we know is that its nonsense to believe that recovery has some sort of expiration date. I like the idea of someone coasting for a month or longer and then recommitting themselves to recovery. Its never too late.
           
          What does tend to happen is "adaptation." The word refers to the notion that if you do the same techniques you get the same results. Survivors and therapists can both cause adaptation. Therapists can get used to what they use and go automatic and unimaginative with treatments. Survivors can get lazy and not push against their present abilities. 

          Bottom line: There is good  evidence in the research that so-called "chronic" survivors can continue to make progress.

          Don't stop. Don't stagnate. Don't let a lull convince you recovery has ended.
          7 comments:

          Thursday, February 6, 2014

          Wanna write a book?

          From the publisher of my book...You can email her directly (contact info, below) if you're interested. Best, -pete

          "I’ve been thinking about two possible new books on stroke for our list and I wondered if you might know of anyone who might be interested in writing them:
           
          A Caregiver’s Guide to Stroke: a handbook to help the caregiver, addressing all of the issues and best practices they should know about: creating and managing a health care team, dealing with the various physical, emotional and cognitive issues, etc. The right author would most likely be a social worker, therapist, or professional caregiver.
           
          Myths vs. Facts on stroke: a book aimed at dispelling the myths/misinformation about the causes, treatment, physical and cognitive impact of stroke." 

          Julia Pastore
          Executive Editor, Demos Health Publishing
          jpastore@demoshealth.com
          2 comments:

          Tuesday, February 4, 2014

          Yes! Stretch!

          The small units that make up muscles are called sarcomeres.
          Help! Stretch me!
          Sarcomeres shorten when we contract our muscles. When we stretch for a long time, there is an increase in the number of sarcomeres. Literally, muscles get longer.

          For example, increased flexibility is directly related to an increased number of sarcomeres. One of the ways that the number of sarcomeres can increase happens to all of us: Growth from birth to out 21st year. Growth in the length of bones during childhood provides a prolonged stretch of muscles. As muscles are stretched to their physiological limit they react by developing an increase number of sarcomeres. Stretch has to be of sufficient duration for this remodeling of muscle to occur.

          The opposite is true as well. When muscles are left in shortened position, the number of sarcomeres decreases. Nothing provides a prolonged shortening of muscles like spasticity after stroke and brain injury.

          So all the rules of stretching are thrown out the window when the muscle is spastic.

          How is spastic muscle different than normal muscle? Let me count the ways...

          Spastic muscles... 
          •have lost some (if not all) communication with the brain.
          •are often kept in a shortened position on the "bad" side for long periods of time.
          •are not subject to the same rules of stretch. (That rule: The more you stretch the longer the muscle will become.)

          Spasticity after brain injury keeps muscles (on the "bad" side) in a shortened position long enough to lose sarcomeres.

          It comes as some surprise to most therapists, but there is very little scientific evidence that stretching muscle reduces spasticity. In the very short term there is a small reduction in spasticity. But spasticity is not reduced in any lasting way by stretching because spasticity is not caused by muscles. Spasticity is caused by brain injury. Brain injury causes the brain to cede muscular control to spinal reflexes. Increasing the number of sarcomeres will not reduce spasticity. If it did, every case of spasticity would be eliminated by a regimented stretching program. And wouldn't that be nice?

          Soooooo... Should you not stretch? No! I mean yes! I'm confused! Yes, you should stretch!

          Why should you stretch? Because even if stretch has no lasting effect on spastic muscle, there are several reasons to do it anyway. Stretch... 
          •feels good 
          •reduces spasticity for a sort amount of time 
          •is good for joints 
          •may be good for other tissue besides muscle (ligaments, veins/arteries, nerves, skin, etc.)
          5 comments:

          Friday, January 24, 2014

          Since when is “productive” fun?

          When it comes to stroke recovery, no clinician, no matter how skilled, can "do it for them." Recovery from stroke is dependent on repetitive and demanding practice by the owner of the damaged nervous system—the survivor. If done correctly repetitive and demanding practice drives cortical plasticity ("brain rewiring") robustly enough to be evident in increased quality of movement.

          But this sort of repetitive practice is boring! Repetitive practice does not necessarily involve functional activity. For example, a clinician, seeing a deficit in the last 15 or 20° of dorsiflexion, may have the patient repetitively practice dorsiflexion, irrespective of ambulation. At least in that example the end goal, whether it's stated or not, is obvious; walking. In the upper extremity repetitive practice of single joint movements may or may not relate to any particular everyday activity. Instead repetitive practice may be used just to increase active range of motion in those joints. Because it does not involve anything functional, repetitive practice can be inherently boring.  And what makes it even more boring is that stroke survivors aren't even working on anything novel; there relearning movement that they used to do perfectly well. So where's the motivation?

          The motivation ends up being a conjuring. Some of this motivation may come from the minds of clinicians. OTs, PTs and speech therapists should try to make repetitive practice as interesting as possible. But some of this motivation comes from the survivor. The survivor needs the imagination enough to understand how this hard and boring work will help realize potential.
          2 comments:

          Sunday, January 19, 2014

          The STROKE-O-MATIC 76

          When it comes to selling stroke-recovery machines to therapists, the phrase "another tool in the toolbox" is all the rage. Vendors (sellers) use the toolbox idea to soft-peddle to therapists. Here's how the pitch goes...

          "We have this great new machine. It works great. Now, I'm not saying to pitch what you use. I'm just saying that this machine of mine is...another tool in the toolbox." But therapy time is very (very), very limited. So, Ms. Therapist, if you use their machine, there'll be no time for what you have been using. And the vendor knows this. 

          But the vendor is scared to say their version of the truth which is, "My machine works better than what you have been using" because that suggests the therapist has been providing something less than the best. (And you don't insult the client, right?) But that's exactly what they are saying. My machine works better than what you usually use... Instead, the vender, fearing being considered condescending treats the clinician like a child and says, "You're doing just fine. This is just another tool for your toolbox." Its like telling a child, "I love Joey, your (stinking, puked-on) Teddy bear  too. But lets just get another Teddy. You can keep Joey too (in the garbage!) but we'll buy you this new one."
          I find this even more condescending to therapists than giving it to them straight. Vendors, if you think your thingy works better, say so. Not to is spineless because you've not stepped up for the people who need you. No, not therapists (your bank account or your boss). You've not stepped up for survivors. If your thing works, get behind it. And if you are truly behind it, soft-peddling just makes you someone who'd rather make the sale than do the right thing.

          Of course, if you want $ over integrity, you'll get neither.

          3 comments:

          Saturday, January 18, 2014

          Allergic to milk... right.

          There are so many stories that survivors have written about their recovery. But this one is special because it comes from a survivor that knows the experience from every angle, and exceeded expectations in every way.


          My Story of Striving in the Post Stroke World
          By Mitch Raymond
           
          When most people think of stroke, they think of it happening to people 50+ years of age in the latter half of life due to a blood clot or hemorrhage in the brain. People are absolutely shocked when I tell them that it can happen at any age of life. Take me for example, I had my stroke during my childhood and in the beginning, I was very debilitated.  It was an uphill battle filled with many twists and turns but I was able to make it from being a debilitated child to being a fully functioning adult with a wife, two children, and a successful career to support them by the time I got around to typing up/voice dictating this story 30 years later.       

          The career that I chose, and currently practice today is Physical Therapy. This allows me to integrate my personal stroke rehab experience with my PT knowledge and clinical experience.  In turn, that allows me to better help my clients improve their functional abilities.  Some may ask how I was able to achieve this level of success.  Well, it did take open-mindedness, curiosity, will power, perseverance, determination, research, and a lot of life experience, but I did not achieve this alone.  With the guidance of therapists, teachers, friends, colleagues, fellow people with disabilities, and of course my loving family, I was able to overcome many of the obstacles that stood in my way toward success.

          I had my stroke back on January, 17th 1989 when I was 6 years old. I had a benign brain tumor that was a birth defect. By the time I was five, the tumor was golf ball sized and it had made itself one with my left middle cerebral artery. Up until the tumor was found, I was having seizures that were getting worse and worse. In the beginning, they were just daydreaming spells. But they gradually became more involved. My mom eventually took me to the local doctor when I was four years old. It was determined that I was allergic to milk without anything more than the most superficial of diagnostic observations. By the time I was five, the seizures consisted of the following. I would be playing with my older brother when all of the sudden I would go into a trance. I would then proceed to walk toward my mother and sit in her lap, stand by her side, or walk in circles for a minute or two. She would frantically try to get me to respond during that time, but I could not answer or I would answer in incoherent babble. I would then proceed to walk toward the bathroom, vomit and collapse. Allergic to milk... right.
          The last photo that was taken of Mitch
          before tumor removal surgery

          My parents could only trust the original doctor so far and then decided to get a second, third and even fourth opinion to make sure the real diagnosis was found and sound. When the tumor diagnosis was confirmed at UMass Medical via CT scan and MRI, I was sent to Boston Children's Hospital for surgery. 

          Anyone who knows arteries knows how fragile they are, especially when a tumor has to be extruded off of one. Thus, when the tumor was surgically extruded, my left middle cerebral artery hemorrhaged leading to my stroke.

          When I exited out of the OR (I don't remember this, mind you), I stared up at my parents and then to the surgeon who had just saved my life and said "I... hhate... yoou." He smiled up at my parents and said "no big deal, I get that all the time." He was a doctor with a great sense of humor, along with just being a great doctor in general, because he saved my life.
           
          My affected side (right side), was totally flaccid (paralyzed) post-operation.  I could not even support my own posture to sit in a regular wheelchair. They ended up having to put me into a special wheelchair that put me into a propped up but laying down position. On top of that, I had double vision and anomic aphasia. 

          Textbook characteristics of anomic aphasia include trouble using correct names for people, places or things; speaking hesitantly because of difficulty naming words; difficulty finding words may be evident in writing as well as speech; reading ability may be impaired; and having knowledge of what to do with an object, but still unable to name the object. I had every one of these characteristics at first, but I was able to work through most of them through speech therapy, which I had for six years after the stroke.  After that 6 year period of speech therapy, word retrieval fluency was the only residual deficit from the anomic aphasia.  

          After the tumor extrusion surgery, the doctors told my parents that I may never walk again. The keyword there was "MAY," but my parents took it as "Will." That was until I started rehab. My PT was the first therapist I saw and my parents
          told her that the doctor said I WILL never walk again. The PT smiled and said "we'll see about that; no prognosis is set in stone when it comes to stroke rehab." This was by report from my parents later in life when I could comprehend such things.

          It was through PT that within three months I could walk again and within six months I could run and play with the other kids with a significant limp. I kept having PT until sixth grade, when my playing sports took priority over PT.   

          In school sports, I always felt subpar due to my weak right side.  That was until I joined the Vermont Special Olympics (VTSO).  It was through the swimming and skiing competitions that I realized that it was possible for people/kids to be more disabled than I was and still outperform someone like me through hard work, through a significant amount of practice, and determination.  

          I practiced for, and competed in, the VTSO from 1992 to 1997.  By 1997, I was competing well and had built up enough confidence in the sport of downhill skiing that I started coaching other kids with disabilities to compete in the winter VTSO games. I credit the VTSO with giving me the confidence boost I needed to become a successful adult.

          In school from elementary school into high school, writing/typing narratives for school assignments was agonizing due to my residual word retrieval fluency problems on top of having to write with my formerly non-dominant left hand and type with only one hand as well.  I had this difficulty right up until high school when a new piece of technology came my way. 

          In sophomore year of high school, I was introduced to Dragon Naturally Speaking voice dictation software.  At first, it was terribly difficult to train and use due to the accuracy issues of the program combined with my difficulty efficiently retrieving words.  However, after a year or two of using it, two remarkable things happened. One was the program became more used to my speech patterns and two was that the residual word retrieval fluency problems that I had were significantly reduced.  This occurred due to the need to speak in complete sentences in order to get the program to transcribe the correct words on to the document that I am writing.  To this day I still use Dragon Naturally Speaking and other voice dictation software to more efficiently perform word processing projects and it has made a world of difference.

          My biggest regret from my childhood was in regards to my neglect of my right hand.  I did have one period of late in the game progress when my mom signed me up for Constraint Induced Movement Therapy for two weeks one summer while in high school. I retained my thumb and forefinger pincher grasp through this therapy, but I still neglected the use of my hand into my first year at college.

          I went to Boston University for one semester of Aerospace Engineering and then one semester Astrophysics. All the while spasticity was actually increasing in my elbow, forearm/wrist and hand muscles out of neglect. I saw this and also saw that my life wasn't going the way I wanted it to. I ended up withdrawing from BU and taking a year off to re-assess my life.

          That summer, I began to design my own therapy regimen with everyday household items (PVC Pipe, a basketball, pen and paper, cups, utensils, etc). With this I started to see some of my control returning and started to develop an interest for the first time in the rationale behind the rehabilitative therapy interventions I had been through. I then started shadowing local Physical Therapists to see what rehab was like from the perspective of the therapist. I was fascinated by their descriptions of the rationales behind their interventions. I wanted to know more both for myself and potentially for others to see if I was able to accomplish what it took to become a therapist. Thus, I started applying to and visiting colleges again and finally got into the Quinnipiac University Master of Physical Therapy (MPT) program.
           
          PT school was one of the most difficult challenges that I have ever put myself through.  Not only was it mentally challenging due to the amount of information that I had to cram into my memory banks for each test, but it was physically challenging as well on a neuromuscular level.  Almost every single hands on technique that we learned and practiced needed to be adapted to my physical capabilities with my stroke affected right upper extremity.  In the beginning, this was hard not only mentally, but socially and emotionally as well due to the fact that my adaptive techniques made me stand out amongst my peers with my different approaches to the text book ways we were learning each technique.  This made me feel somewhat of an outcast amongst my fellow students because a lot of them did not want to get confused by my alternative approaches to the text book techniques that they were trying to master.

          I even dealt with a select few of my instructors who were hesitant to allow me hands on experience with clients in the field due to being insecure about my physical capabilities.  One time, one of my neurorehab professors allowed every single member of my lab group to get hands on with a stroke survivor from facilitating balance work to transfer, gait and stair training; everyone except for me of course.  I know now that I could have been hands on with that client in the field lab and been totally safe with him if I had been given a chance to be hands on.  I was so put off by this experience that I reported this incident to the heads of my department and vowed to never let it happen again.


          Being a student of PT also had its perks. I got to learn from some of the greatest PT minds in the field with regard to their educated and well researched perspective to my case as a stroke survivor. I also had the privilege of being a subject of a graduate PT study on the application of Saebo Splint products. I even got Botox injections to tone down my spasticity in my forearm and hand so that it could be easier to stretch and work my hand with the Saebo stretch and the Saebo flex splints that I got to practice with. Unfortunately, the project was cut short due to my catching Mono during my week trip down to New Orleans in 2005 to be a part of the Katrina Relief effort.After 5 years of schooling, a year of clinical affiliations, and hundreds of hours studying PT baseline knowledge and skill sets, I finally sat down to the PT Board exams and passed 1st time around.

          Today, I am a PT licensed in the state of New York, a husband to my wonderful soul mate, and father to my 2 loving sons. Since 2010, I have worked in all aspects of inpatient rehab as well as in home care. I currently work in a home care agency in upstate New York.  I also lead a local stroke support group called Friends and Family Stroke Recovery Group. It is through PT that I have accomplished many of my life's goals. It is also through PT that I still work on my ongoing goal of continuing to regain the control and use of my right hand. As a PT, I work hard every day to help people achieve their goals of regaining their functional mobility through applied evidence based practice, education given to each patient about my approaches to each of their cases, and empathy. Some people believe stroke is a curse. For me, my stroke was a blessing because it made me who I am today, a Physical Therapist who can truly empathize with the hard but rewarding work of rehabilitation through my life as a Physical Therapy patient and professional status post stroke.

          If anyone has questions or comments, you can send them to the following email and mitch will reply when he can.  Email: mitchraymond614@gmail.com
          1 comment:
          Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

          Blog Archive