Thursday, December 24, 2015

Don't believe the hype -OR- Have you been lowballed? -OR- Clinician fulfilled prophecy



Bottom line: 
What the therapist predicted: very little
What the survivor achieved: a lot

Let me tell you about a stroke survivor I worked with a year or so ago. I'll call him "Sam."

I was working in a skilled nursing facility. The physical therapist (PT) did Sam's evaluation.  The PT then told me Sam would be added to my caseload. 

I read the PT evaluation and it was pretty shocking. One thing stuck out: The "long-term goals" were one thing: "bed mobility." 

There it was. The best that Sam was expected to do was to be able to roll around in his bed. He wouldn't be able to stand. And walking was beyond belief.

The day Sam was to have his first treatment I went to the nurses station to read his chart before I met him. Nursing facilities often have a cluster of patients in wheelchairs right around the nurses station. It's where all the action is.

As I began to read Sam's chart I asked one of the nurses to point Sam out to me. She pointed to a gent in a wheelchair. "That couldn't be him"- I thought. If he could not get around the bed, how did nurses get him in a wheelchair?  The nurse: "That's him. He came in yesterday." 

This was the guy who's long-term goals were "bed mobility."
That day he took his first step. Two weeks later he was lapping the facility several times, without an AFO, and beginning to walk outside. Yes, we were both a "hot mess" by the end of treatments, but it was fun. Sam would get called out by staff "Amazing! Keep going Sam! Lookin' good!" In fact, some of the folks with dementia thought it was some sort of conga line so by the end of our walk we'd have a parade! 

P.S: There may be several reasons for the physical therapist lowballing expectations. Maybe Sam was exhausted by the experience of being transferred from hospital to skilled nursing. Maybe his meds had changed. Maybe he was admitted so late that by the time the therapist got there he was asleep and the therapist had to wake him and he was very tired. 

Or maybe: 

Some clinicians are so concerned with deficits that they miss potential.

Sunday, November 29, 2015

Splinting after stroke? Why?





The research into splinting stroke survivors is clear: It does not work. Let’s have a look. 

Forget individual studies… they don’t count for much. Rather, let’s look at the meta-analyses (or “metas”). Metas are studies of all the studies available and will quickly tell you if something works. Or at least its the best tool we have to come as close as possible to "the truth." 

The granddaddy of all metas, the Cochrane review, has looked at splinting after stroke. The review states, 


Ouch.
...

After stroke there are a number of reasons that you’re supposed to splint the wrist/hand/fingers. Here is the logic:

The survivor tends to posture with the wrist and fingers flexed (bent at the wrist and the fingers in a fist) Why do survivor’s posture like that? It has to do with the brain injury. Because the brain is no longer in full control, the stronger of the two muscle groups takes over. Imagine you have a ping pong paddle in your hand… what movement do you think is stronger, the wrist extended (like the follow through in a ping pong backhand), or the wrist forward (like the follow through in a ping pong forehand)? It’s actually the forehand/ flexion posture. OK, that’s why the wrist flexes (down, towards the forearm). What about the fingers? Same thing… the moment of the fingers to close the fingers (fist) is stronger than the movement to open the hand.

But why does this natural posture in survivors suggest to therapists that the hand and wrist be splinted? In some ways, it has to do with the same philosophy that scientific medicine has about treating everything. If she has a fever, try to cool the her down. If she can’t sleep, give her sleeping meds. If she’s nauseous, give her a pill to reduce the nausea.  Of course, there is the opposite view. For instance we know that the immune system works better when the body is feverish, so maybe we should let the fever run its course. If someone can’t sleep, maybe there is a reason and the person should exercise. If there is nausea, maybe what the body is trying to rid itself of…should.  

Let’s get back to splinting of the wrist/hand… What does the joint want to do? Flex. So the scientific perspective would be: do the opposite-extend. What keeps joints in an extended position? Splints. So when therapists splint, they’re taking the scientific medical perspective. But as shown by the Cochrane meta, above,  the science disagrees. 

One last thing; I’m sure I will hear it from the pro-splinting lobby. Please save your time if you have anecdotal “splinting worked great for me” “evidence.” Unless you are willing to collect data using high reliability/validity outcome measures and have that data accepted as a result of the peer reviewed process, it is not evidence. On the other hand, you may just be an outlier and splinting did work on you. I'd suggest, however, if you do think it worked on you, you establish that it did in fact, work. What and how did you measure? Was your measurement accurate? Was your test valid and reliable? These are the things we sweat in research. In fact, I'd suggest that if you are measuring the two things splints purport to effect, range of motion and spasticity (i.e. goniometery and the modified Ashworth), that you have a partner given that both of these tests have to be done by someone other than the tested. 

Saturday, November 14, 2015

How Instant Gratification Can Hurt Recovery

(Note: The following is a fleshing out of a previous blog entry)
Instant gratification can hurt stroke recovery. Here’s how…

Let’s say you want to retain soft tissue length in finger and wrist flexors. What do you do? How about a static splint?
It makes sense; you hold the soft tissue in a lengthened position and the soft tissue won’t shorten, right? There’s only one problem: The evidence suggests static hand/ wrist splinting does not improve movement, function, reduction of spasticity, nor does it retain soft tissue length. So what does splinting do? It provides instant gratification. The therapist can claim they’ve done something and the stroke survivor believes something is being done.

Here are some other options that play the same trick… 
  • Stretching to reduce spasticity
  • Handling techniques
  • Tapping a tendon to get a muscle to fire
All of the above are good and bad
  • The good: Instant gratification
  • The bad: no evidence of long term efficacy.
Then again, what’s the harm? If a therapist wants to progress the leg during gait by tapping the quads, why is that bad? It’s not bad, but it may be… unhelpful, confusing to the survivor and a waste of therapy resources. Using the same the same example, tapping the quads to progress the leg here’s how it may be unhelpful:

A survivor with footdrop is in the parallel bars (II bars to the rehab nerds). The therapist taps the quads, progressing the tibia at the knee. The tapping puts a quick stretch which the golgi tendon organ perceives as potentially damaging to the quad which, through spinal reflexes, contracts to protect itself, progressing the tibia. The survivor is able to take a step.

OK, we have the instant gratification done. Now, what about the next step? Another tap? What happens when the survivor wants to take a step on their own? They felt their own muscles contracting when the therapist tapped them, but can the survivor do the same thing to himself? That’s confusing. And what is the carryover of the tendon tapping? Is there any physiological advantage the next day, the next hour, the next step? 

Most of the rehab and neuroscience research suggests having the survivor struggle to get their leg to through swing, by hook or by crook, utilizing whatever they have. This sort of “productive struggle” is what drives neuroplasticity post-stroke. If there’s one thing we know about brain plasticity its this: it won’t happen if it’s easy. Tapping makes it easy, but there is no long term benefit. Further, it is confusing to the patient. "Wow, I did that!"- they may think. If you elicit one of your spinal reflexes, yes, it is your muscles doing the movement. But it is not voluntary movement. The only way to get that movement again is to elicit the reflex again.

The same is true with stretching to reduce contractures and/or spasticity. Does stretch have a short term effect? Sure. Might that effect have some clinical usefulness? Sure. Will the impact of a single stretching session or even long term program of stretching reduce spasticity? Again, there is neither supporting research nor long term efficacy.

And handling techniques like NDT? Instant gratification, yes because you can get a survivor who can’t move to move and move without “pathological movement patterns” because, basically, the clinician is moving the survivor. But there is a bit of skepticism among researchers. Here is the Wikipedia take on itHere's my take on NDT. 

My suggestion is for clinicians to ask, “What will be the effect after the next associated reaction (laughing, sneezing, getting up from a chair), later the same day, later in the week, 6 months later, and so on?”

And survivors should be asking the same question.

Thursday, October 29, 2015

10 things that work against survivors.

1. Fault: survivors, caregivers. Most stroke survivors don't get to the hospital nearly soon enough. A lot of stroke survivors, as they are having the stroke, feel overwhelmed with  fatigue-- so they go to sleep. And this delays getting to the hospital. Many other symptoms of stroke are either ignored, or passed off as completely separate issues.

Monday, October 26, 2015

Saebo: Faster than ever!


"My son" loves the show "The Flash" and lo and behold, he (Mr. Flash) was wearing a Saeboflex in tonight's episode! 


Thursday, October 15, 2015

The 2 minute survivor exam that tells you a ton






I've been involved in a lot of trials that have involved brain scanning. (example)

Saturday, October 10, 2015

The Wrong Question

"What is the single most important thing you should know about stroke rehab treatments?"

That's easy: You're asking the wrong question.

If you are talking about rehabilitation treatments you are talking clinical stuff. You are talking about a clinician-- usually a therapist-- in a clinical setting. And both clinician and clinic are great but they are not enough during two time periods:

1.  Every day
2. Once you're discharged from therapy.

Let's consider why clinical stuff "every day" is not enough. How much therapy might you get? An hour-- two-- three? Recovery is a full time job during the first few months after stroke and it is the first few months after stroke that you're still seeing therapists. So even when therapists are there, there almost always not there enough.

OK, now lets take "Once your discharged from therapy." Discharged from therapy is in and of itself the very definition of not enough therapy, because you've been discharged. Discharged like a bullet from a gun, off you go! So once you are discharged you are definitely not getting enough clinical stuff.

So maybe the question ("What is the single most important thing you should know about stroke rehab treatments?") is wrong. What if instead the question was "What is the single most important thing you should know about stroke recovery options?"

Isn't that freeing? You are no longer under the rules of managed care because managed care does not care if you try, on your own, to take on your recovery using whatever options you can find. You can spend as much time as you want. And even if recovery options are an adjunct to rehabilitation treatments, they expand the opportunities for recovery.

So, "What is the single most important thing you should know about stroke recovery options?"

Sweat equity. That's it. The more you put in, the more you make your brain uncomfortable and force it to change. The more repetitions, the more challenge, the more focus the more recovery.

Sunday, October 4, 2015

Oh dear blog, how I have neglected thee!

Oh dear blog, how I have neglected thee!

Saturday, August 22, 2015

ANGER: It helps recovery!



Quick funny stroke survivor story. This comes from an OT who told it at one of my stroke recovery seminars.

"I had this guy, he was a right hemi and totally expressively aphasic but could understand everything. I kept telling him that he had to move his right arm. "You gotta move it or it wont get better.' 

He got so frustrated with me he would just keep giving me the finger. "It wont get better unless you use it!' Finger. 'How are you going to get it back if you don't use it?' Finger.

So finally I said, "Tell you what: You can give me the finger all you want, but you got to do it with your right hand."

So, apparently he goes home and spends all night trying to get that finger up and sure enough... the next day he walks in to the gym and gives me the finger with the right hand! And I was like, "THAT'S GREAT! Now we have something to work with!'

And everyone looked at us like we were crazy."

Saturday, July 25, 2015

Shortened Achilles? Here's an option.

There are 3 reasons drop-foot happens:

1. Stroke is a brain injury. The brain injury no longer provides enough "brain power" to  activate the muscle that lift the foot (tibialis anterior).

2. Survivors often have spasticity of the calf muscles. The job of the calf is to cause a "toe down" posture at the ankle. A spastic calf muscle is one that contracts too much, forcing the "toe down" position.

3. Because of both #1 and 2, above, there is often a contracture (permanent shortening) of the calf muscle and the Achilles tendon.

There are a number of aids and shots and exercises and so on to help drop-foot, but I'd like to focus on one option. Its called Percutaneous Achilles Tendon Lengthening.

Quick hits:

  • It is a surgery, often done outpatient and under a local. 
  • Healing takes 6-8 weeks
  • GRAPHIC video here 
  • Its permanent
  • Its effect is (after healing) immediate

Wednesday, July 1, 2015

Do doctors know?

Medical doctors. MDs. They can be your best friend. If you’ve had a stroke they spent a lot 
Sherrington
A great MD/Scientist
that advanced stroke recovery
of their decade-plus of schooling training to save your life and save as much of your brain as they possibly could. When some MDs show up at the Pearly Gates, St. Peter is going to provide velveteen pathways to the VIP room.

BUT.

Let’s be clear about this, your doctor is probably not a scientist. Very few are. The ones that are usually work at major academic institutions. Think Johns Hopkins.

A few quick points here…
1. Without a doubt, a rare few MDs do great, great scientific work that promotes medicine. 

2. Almost all medical science is developed by neuroscientists, biologists, chemists, etc. Scientists develop treatments (from x-ray
Taub
A great
psychologist who
advanced stroke recovery.

to antibiotics) and MDs make it illegal for anyone beyond themselves to prescribe them. Sometimes they make great gatekeepers, but they often screw it up. 


Most MDs don’t do science, don’t do clinical trials and are not qualified as scientists. Many MDs are not qualified to interpret the science they need to do their jobs, especially if they are not specialized in the area in question. Asking a GP about leading-edge rheumatoid arthritis treatment is like asking a soccer player about basketball’s triangle offence; they may know, but they probs don’t. Even asking, say, a neurologist about, say, migraine is a mistake. How many pathologies do neurologists treat? Countless, that’s how many. Will they be an expert on migraine? Maybe.

So what does this mean to you, dear survivor? It means you have to do your own research, and find your own experts.

There is a bit of good news…if you are willing to work a bit. If you go to PubMed and ask it your questions (i.e.: aphasia stroke recovery) articles by scientists who are experts will bubble up and from there it’s just a hop-skip and jump to their email address. Ask the scientists on the bleeding edge your question. (Hint; be clear, specific and respectful for the best results.) Hack through the pseudo-scientific gobbledygook of medicine (haven’t you exhausted that already anyway?) and get to the extraordinary.

Off you go… 

Sunday, May 31, 2015

C'mon baby...

Here is a flowchart used to guide recovery of walking after stroke...

Boy, that's complicated! 

How do we learn how to walk in the first place- as infants? Does it involve "treatments" that span from "Task Specific Training" to orthotics?

Stroke recovery is hurt by complexity. When rehab options become too complicated the stroke survivor is separated from their own recovery because they don't know what to do. 

Forget survivors for the moment... At some point stroke recovery can become so complicated that even clinicians don't understand it. Or they don't understand the technology in the complicated system because they never interface with that complicated technology. 

Have a look at the algorithm above. I would argue the whole thing is not only way too complicated, it's also incorrect.

I would like to rewrite the entire algorithm like this...

Post-stroke ambulation most benefits from task specific training. Translation: Walking more improves walking.

Tuesday, May 26, 2015

Socializing, Play and Moving Helps Drive Recovery

Part of your recovery may depend on how much fun your having while you recover.
Enriched environments (EE) are what we all want. It's why we send our kids to good schools, why we seek out new experiences and why we travel.  It turns out that enriched environments are very good for the brain. One of the main enrichments of environment that humans have is social interaction.

What do enriched environments have to do with stroke recovery? A ton.

What hurts social interaction? A stroke.

It turns out that there's pretty good evidence that stroke survivors engaged in enriched environments recover more. More than what, you may ask. Survivors involved in environments rich in social interaction, physical activity, and interesting experiences recover more than survivors who are not in enriched environment.


There is one caveat… Most of this research has been done on animals. The reason was done in animals is that it would be impossible to do the same sort of research and humans. Imagine a human study like this would go…

You would have to groups:


The control group: survivors would be involved in a highly social environment in which there were a lot of games played, a lot of conversations and a lot of physical activity.


The experimental group: survivors would be put in a cell where they were fed well, but did not engage any other humans in anyway.


A study like that on humans would be considered… What's the word? Unethical. That's the word: Unethical.


How do you find rats that have had a stroke? You give them one. Researchers surgically cause a stroke in the rats. (video here

They then separated the rats into an experimental 
and control group. 

(Note: the idea of enriching environments is beginning to be tested in human survivors. It is made ethical by letting one group do what they normally would do while the experimental group got an increase in physical, cognitive, and social activity.)


What does the research show about the effect of enriched environments on stroke recovery? The rat stroke survivors in the enriched environments had better proprioception (sense of movement) than the rats that were left to themselves. 


Thursday, May 14, 2015

Recovery depends on neuroplasticity? Yeah...not entirely.

There's this idea among many clinicians and survivors that when it comes to recovery it's all about neuroplasticity. Certainly, my book as well as many of my articles support this concept. But it's not 100% true. Some of recovery comes from stuff other than neuroplasticity.

Blog Archive